The Question
How
does language shape us? How do we learn it? Who is it meant for? How does language
privilege some over others? How does language affect memory? How does language change over time?
We will discuss these questions and more over the course of the semester, both in class and on this blog.
This site is a shared opportunity between two classes, where you will learn a little about language and
you will learn a little about each other.
The Assignment
You are responsible for posting 24 reflective comments throughout the course of the semester that
demonstrate critical thinking skills. Your comments may be
on the post itself or on someone else's comment. All comments will be assessed on the full credit scale.
Only planned, well-thought out, edited comments will receive full credit. Whenever you want to know how
many comments I have recorded for you, I will respond to email
inquiries only.
Please remember that this is not a forum for attacking - this is a forum for expansion and thought.
There should be no derisive comments made at any point to your peers. Also, please keep in mind safe
internet habits. Sign your posts with a first name and last initial and do not reveal personal
information such as phone numbers, addresses, or bank information.
The News
NPR
BBC
MSNBC
The Arbiter
Idaho Statesman
Boise Weekly
Feminst Majority Foundation
Men's News Daily
The Archives
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
The Extras
I am offering extra credit throughout the semester for anyone who notices language use outside of the
class that relates to what we are discussing in class. This could be a film, a billboard, a conversation
with a parent...anything that you can connect to our conversations. First, you will talk to me about it
to discuss the direction you will take when you write it and what I expect before giving you extra
credit. Then you will write up a two page explanation of
the language use and how it relates to class (your write-up should contain far more analysis and connection
to class than synopsis) and turn it in to me before finals week begins.
There is another chance for extra credit! Submit your letters to the editor to
The Arbiter and bring me the edition of the
paper that contains your letter. You will receive credit for one informal writing assignment.
PLEASE NOTE THIS CHANGE TO THE SYLLABUS: Your syllabus currently says that there will be class on November 16 but not on
November 14. Please switch those dates. There WILL be class on November 14 and there WILL NOT be class on November 16.
Anything currently listed as homework due on November 16 is now due on November 14.
There is a second change to the syllabus!
101 - We will meet Nov. 7 instead of Nov. 5. Your portfolio is now due Nov. 5.
102 - Your portfolio is now due during your group conference.
Saturday, October 14, 2006
We're moving into a section that looks at a very interesting debate on a specific language feature: Ebonics, or African American Vernacular English (AAVE).
This debate has the ability to turn to a race discussion quickly and easily. I caution you against that right now - before you begin posting on the subject. Our discussion will not address race issues. Our discussion will instead address how this aspect of language is demonstrated in our language, its affects on the people who both use it and don't use it, and where we could go from here in the public debate. The fact of the matter is that Ebonics exists and no amount of well-intentioned ideas will change that. Also, Ebonics is a recognized variation of Standard English - the form of the language you see in most American films, on American news programs, and in the majority of American public forums. It is not a matter of not being able to speak Standard English (i.e. speaking Ebonics has nothing to do with the speaker's intelligence), it is not genetic, it is not merely slang.
The debate is currently focused on the use of Ebonics in schools - more specifically on whether or not teachers who have Ebonics speakers in their classrooms should teach strictly Standard English or if using Ebonics as a teaching tool in the classroom would be effective use of language. One side of the debate says that students should be expected to speak only Standard English because it is the language of the empowered in our country. The other side says that in using Ebonics to teach other things, among those Standard English, students would learn better and more efficiently. The debate continues and extends to music, politics, job prospects - you name it.
For your response, first read
this article for some additional background information and alternate points of view. Then respond directly to the article. Make sure you mention something specific directly out of the article. Do you agree with the statement? Do you disagree? Is this new information to you? Does this help clear up some questions for you? What questions are you left with?